Nadja Schreiber Compo, Ph.D.
  Assistant Professor
  
schreibe@fiu.edu

  University Park Campus
  Office:
DM 288
  Tel.:
(305) 348-3384
 

  Dr. SchreiberComp's Webpage

  I-Lab Research Application

FFIU Legal Psychology

  FIU Psychology Department

 

 

 

 

EDUCATION

Ph.D.Psychology (Honors)
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany

M.S. Psychology
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany

B. A. Psychology
Universität Trier, Germany

 

RESEARCH INTERESTS

Dr. Schreiber Compo’s research focuses on investigative interviewing, especially the interviewing of vulnerable witnesses such as children or the intoxicated. She is both interested in potentially detrimental and beneficial interviewing techniques and their underlying cognitive and social mechanisms to improve the quality and quantity of witness and victim recall. Her research findings are published in scientific journals such as Applied Cognitive Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. Dr. Schreiber Compo has worked with and trained several law enforcement agencies. Her I-LAB involves a variety of undergraduate and graduate projects in the area of witness interviewing.

 

COURSES TAUGHT

  • Introduction to Psychology
  • Child Witnesses
  • Legal Psychology
  • Abnormal Psychology
  • Investigative Interviewing


SELECT AWARDS

Faculty Research Award (PI), College of Arts & Sciences, Florida International University, 2008   

National Postdoctoral Fellowship of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), 2000-2002  

SELECT PUBLICATIONS

Schreiber Compo, N. & Parker, J.F. (in press). Gaining insight into long-term effects of
          inviting speculation: Does recantation help? Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Wright, D.B., Carlucci, M., Evans, J.R. & Schreiber Compo, N. (in press). Turning a blind
           eye to non-blind line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Hyman Gregory, A., Carol, R. N., & Schreiber Compo, N. (in press). Talking with Children
          about Past Events: Children’s Memory and Suggestibility. In E. H. Sandberg & B. L.
          Spritz   (Eds.), A clinician's guide to normal cognitive development in childhood. New
          York, NY: Routledge.
Evans, J.R. & Schreiber Compo, N. (in press). Mock jurors’ perceptions of identifications
          made by intoxicated witnesses. Psychology, Crime and Law.
Evans, J.R., Schreiber Compo, N. & Russano, M. (2009). Intoxicated Witnesses and
          Suspects:Procedures and Prevalence according to Law Enforcement. Psychology,
          
Public Policy and the Law, 15 (3), 194-221.
Malpass, R.S., Tredoux, C.G. , Schreiber Compo, N., McQuiston-Surrett, D., MacLin, O.H.,
          Zimmermann, L.A., & Topp. L.D. (2008). Study space analysis for policy
          development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(6), 789-801.
Norberg, S.F. & Schreiber Compo, N. (2007). Report on an empirical study of district
          variations, and the roles of judges, trustees and debtors’ attorneys in Chapter 13
          bankruptcy cases, 81, The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 431.
Fisher, R.P. & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interviewing protocols to improve eyewitness memory.
           In Toglia, M., Lindsay, R., Ross, D. & Reed, J. (Eds.) The handbook of eyewitness
          
psychology: Volume One. Memory for events (pp.53-80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
          Associates.
Schreiber, N., Bellah, L.D., Martinez, Y., McLaurin, K., Strok, R., Garven, S., &
          Wood, J.M. (2006). Suggestive interviewing  in the McMartin preschool and Kelly
          Michaels day   care abuse cases: A quantitative analysis. Social Influence, 1 (1), 16-47.
Fisher, R. P. & Schreiber, N. (2005). Forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology: Forensic
          interviewing. In J. Payne-James, R. Byard, T. Corey, & C. Henderson (Eds.)
          Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine (pp.371-378). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Schreiber, N. & Parker, J.F. (2004). Inviting child witnesses to speculate: Effects of age and
          interaction on children’s recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89 (1), 31-52.
Schreiber, N., Wentura, D. & Bilsky, W. (2001). What else could he have done? – Creating
          false answers in child witnesses by ‚inviting speculation‘. Journal of Applied
         
Psychology, 86 (3), 525-532.
Schreiber, N. (2000). „Interviewing techniques in sexual abuse cases – a comparison of a day-
          care abuse case with normal abuse cases“. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59 (3),196-206.
Schreiber, N. (2000). Zeugenbefragung von Kindern – Wie wirkt die Technik „Einladen zur
          Spekulation?“. Grevenbroich: Linos-Verlag. (book)
Sporer, S.L., Bursch, S.E., Schreiber, N., Weiss, P.E., Höfer, E., Sievers, K. & Köhnken, G.
          (2000). Detecting deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgement Scales (ARJS):
          Inter-rater reliability. In A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz & J. Wojcikiewicz (Eds.),
          Forensic psychology and law. Traditional questions and new ideas (pp.197-204).
          Krakow: Institute of Forensic Research Publishers.