Research Activities
The Legal Psychology Program prides itself on its record of research scholarship. Both faculty and
students are encouraged to become actively engaged in grant writing, publications and conference presentations. Below are a sample of these activities. Please note these were last updated in April 2005.
Grants
Publications
GRANTS TO FACULTY & GRADUATE STUDENTS (1995 - PRESENT)
(Current and former students are in bold)
Bahrick, L., & Parker, J. F. (1992-1995). Young children's reactions to a natural disaster: Memory and stress -- Hurricane Andrew. National Science Foundation ($49,521).
Berman, G. L. (1995). Inconsistent eyewitness testimony and jury decision-making. American Psychology-Law Society ($400).
Cutler, B. L., & Kravitz, D. K. (1994-1996). Validity of intuitive theories underlying legal safeguards in cases involving eyewitness identification. National Science Foundation ($123,557).
Cutler, B. L., & Kravitz, D. K. (1996-1997). Supplemental request to “Validity of intuitive theories underlying legal safeguards in cases involving eyewitness identification”. National Science Foundation ($30,570).
Danielsen, E. (2005). Predicting jurors’ decisions: Can forewarning and commitment moderate the effects of repeated expression in civil voir dire? American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Evans, J. (2005). The effects of intoxication and anxiety on witness accounts of a mock crime. American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Gilbert, J. (2004). Improving civil jury decision-making: Evidentiary and procedural issues. American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Kovera, M. B. (2001). Lay versus expert knowledge of the consequences of sexual harassment. Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues ($2000).
Haw, R. M. (2002). What we know: A survey comparison of community and expert knowledge. American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Hebert, K. S., (1996). Are jurors effective consumers of scientific testimony? American Psychology-Law Society ($400).
Hebert, K. S. (1998). Jurors' use of social framework evidence. American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Kovera, M. B. (1997). Cognitive, social, and developmental factors in suggestibility: A meta-analysis. FIU Foundation ($10,978).
Kovera, M. B. (1997-2000). Reasoning about scientific evidence: The effects of heuristic cues, evidence quality, and reasoning ability. National Science Foundation ($110,772).
Kovera, M. B. (2002-2005). When juveniles are tried as adults: The effects of voir dire on jury composition and juror decisions. National Science Foundation ($300,062).
Kovera, M. B., & Cutler, B. L. (2000-2002). Investigator bias in identification procedures: Mechanisms and safeguards. National Science Foundation ($191,682).
Levett, L. M. (2002). Can opposing experts educate jurors about unreliable expert evidence on child eyewitness memory? American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Levett, L. M. & Kovera, M. B. (2005). Educating the jury about junk science through an opposing expert witness. Dissertation Grant, National Science Foundation ($12,820).
McAuliff, B. D. (1996). Holding back the “floods” of expert evidence: Are judges effective gatekeepers? American Psychology-Law Society ($400).
McAuliff, B. D. (1998). Are jurors beliefs about witness suggestibility consistent with expert opinion? American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Meissner, C. A. (2002). Improving memory for faces of an unfamiliar race. FIU Foundation ($10,518).
Meissner, C. A. (2003-2006). “They really are different!”: Skilled perceptual memory and the cross-race effect. National Science Foundation ($196,977).
Penrod, S. D. & O’Neil, K. M. (2002-2004). Risk Management and Juries: How Jurors React to Cost-Benefit Analyses. National Science Foundation ($260,000).
Phillips, M. R. (1998). Factors affecting investigator bias in photoarrays American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Russano, M. & Krioukova, M. (2001). Perceptions of interrogations and confessions within the criminal justice community: An experimental study of defense attorneys, prosecutors, and jurors. American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
Trevisan, M., & Fisher, R. P. (1994-1996). Cognition in long-term recall of physical activity. National Institute of Health ($671,000).
York, R. (2005). The “CSI Effect”: Presentation style, evidence quality, and a possible remedy. American Psychology-Law Society ($500).
PUBLICATIONS BY FACULTY & GRADUATE STUDENTS (1995 – PRESENT)
(Current and former students are in bold)
Bahrick, L. E., Parker, J. F., Fivush, R., & Levitt, M. (1998). The effects of stress on young children’s memory for a natural disaster. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 308-331.
Berman, G. L., & Cutler, B. L. (1996). Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decisionmaking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 170-177.
Berman, G. L., & Cutler, B. L. (1998). The influence of processing instructions at encoding and retrieval on face recognition accuracy. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 4(2), 89-106.
Berman, G. L., Narby, D. J., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors' evaluations of eyewitnesses, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 79-88.
Bottoms, B. L., Kovera, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (Eds.) (2002). Children, social science and the law: Research and policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bottoms, B. L., Kovera, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (2002). Children, law, social science, and policy: An introduction to the issues. In B.L. Bottoms, M. B. Kovera, & B. D. McAuliff (Eds.), Children, social science, and the law (p. 1-12). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brewer, N., Potter, R., Fisher, R. P., Bond, N., & Luszcz, M. (1999). Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 297-313.
Brigham, J. C., Meissner, C. A., & Wasserman, A. W. (1999). Applied issues in the construction and expert assessment of photo lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S73-S92.
Brigham, J. C., Wasserman, A. W., & Meissner, C. A. (1999). Disputed eyewitness identification evidence: Important legal and scientific issues. Court Review, 36, 12-25.
Brock, P., Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Examining the Cognitive Interview in a double-test paradigm. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 5, 29-45.
Cass, S. A., & Kovera, M. B. (2001, April). Research on the effects of child pornography is needed. APA Monitor, 32(4), 21.
Collett, M. E., & Kovera, M. B. (2003). The effects of British and American trial procedures on the quality of juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 403-422.
Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: Eyewitnesses, psychology and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Assessing the accuracy of eyewitness identification. In. R. Bull and D. Carson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 193-213). Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1990). Faktoren, die zuverlaessigkeit von zeugenaussagen beeinflussen. In G. Koehnken & S.L. Sporer (Eds.), Identifizierung von tatverdaechtigen durch augenzeugen (pp. 25 51). Stuttgart: Verlag fuer angewandte Psychologie.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Fisher, R. P. (1994). Conceptual, practical and empirical issues associated with eyewitness identification test media. In D. Ross, J. Read and M. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 163-181). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Devenport, J. L., & Fisher, R. P. (1996). The effect of authority and social influence on eyewitness suggestibility and person recognition. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 11, 35-40.
Devenport, J. L., Penrod, S. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1998). Eyewitness identification evidence: Evaluating commonsense evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 3, 338-361.
Faimon, B., O’Neil, K. M., & Bornstein, B. H. (in press). Recovered memory at trial: Effects of abuse type and manner of recovery. In F. Columbus’ (Ed.) Progress in Sociology Research.
Fisher, R. P. (in press) Forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology: Forensic interviewing. In J. Payne-James, R. Byard, T. Corey, & C. Henderson (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Fisher, R. P. (2003). Remembering the Holocaust: Ordinary cognition for extra-ordinary events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 877-879. [Review of R. Kraft (2002): Memory perceived: Recalling the holocaust. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers].
Fisher, R. P. (1999). Are jurors’ perceptions of eyewitness credibility affected by the cognitive interview? Psychology, Crime, and Law, 5, 167-176.
Fisher, R. P. (1999). Probing knowledge. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and Performance: XVII (pp. 537-556). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fisher, R. P. (1996). Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field-research in memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 197.
Fisher, R. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crimes. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 1, 732-764.
Fisher, R.P., Brennan, K.H., & McCauley, M.R. (2002). The cognitive interview method to enhance eyewitness recall. In M. Eisen, G. Goodman, & J. Quas (Eds.) Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 265-286). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. In G. M. Davies, Lloyd-Bostock, S., McMurran, M., & Wilson, C. (Eds.), Psychology and Law: Advances in Research (pp. 21-28). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fisher, R. P., Falkner, K. L., Trevisan, M., & McCauley, M. R. (2000). Adapting the cognitive interview to enhance long-term (35 years) recall of physical activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 180-189.
Fisher, R. P., & McCauley, M. L. (1995). Information retrieval: Interviewing witnesses. In N. Brewer & C. Wilson (Eds.) Psychology and policing (pp. 81-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fisher, R. P., & McCauley, M. L. (1995). Improving eyewitness testimony with the cognitive interview. In M. Zaragoza, J. Graham, G. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. Ben Porath (Eds.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 141-159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fisher, R. P., Mello, E. W., & McCauley, M. R. (1999). Are jurors' perceptions of eyewitness credibility affected by the cognitive interview? Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 167-176.
Fivush, R., Sales, J. M., Goldberg, A., Bahrick, L., & Parker, J. F. (2004). Weathering the storm: Children’s long-term recall of Hurricane Andrew. Memory, 12, 104-118.
Geiselman, R. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1997). Ten years of cognitive interviewing. In D. G. Payne & R. G. Conrad (Eds.), A synthesis of basic and applied approaches to human memory (pp. 191-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gilbert, J. A. E., & Fisher, R. P. (in press). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Gonzales, M. H., Kovera, M. B., Sullivan, J. L., & Chanley, V. (1995). Private reactions to public transgressions: Predictors of evaluative responses to allegations of political misconduct. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 136 148.
Goodwin, K. A., Meissner, C. A., & Ericsson, K. A. (2001). Towards a model of false recall: Experimental manipulation of encoding context and the collection of verbal reports. Memory & Cognition, 29, 806-819.
Greene, E., Chopra, S., Kovera, M. B., Penrod, S. D., Rose, V. G., Schuller, R., & Studebaker., C. (2002). Jurors and juries: A review of the field. In J. Ogloff (Ed.), Taking psychology and law into the 21st century. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Groscup, J., Penrod, S., Huss, M., Studebaker, C., & O'Neil, K. (2002). The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 8, 339-372.
Haw, R. M., & Fisher, R. P. (2004). The effect of administrator-witness contact: Contact with lineup administrators may decrease eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1106-1112
Haw, R. M., & Kovera, M. B. (2002, May). Court considers conditions required for voluntary police searches. APA Monitor, 33(5), 18.
Koehn, C. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1996). Constructing facial composites with the Mac-a-Mug Pro system. Psychology, Crime & Law, 3, 215-224.
Koehn, C., Fisher, R.P., & Cutler, B.L. (1999). Using cognitive interviewing to construct facial composites. In D. Canter & L. Alison (Eds.) Psychology and criminal detection (pp. 41-63). Brookfield: Dartmouth.
Kovera, M. B. (2004). Psychology, law, and the workplace: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 1-7.
Kovera, M. B. (2002). Expert testimony. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, Vol. 8 (pp. 5139-5141). Oxford: Pergamon.
Kovera, M. B. (2002). Psychology and law. In K. L. Hall (Ed.), The Oxford companion to American law (pp. 677-678). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kovera, M. B. (2002). The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: An examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 43-72.
Kovera, M. B., & Borgida, E. (1998). Expert scientific testimony on child witnesses in the age of Daubert. In S. J. Ceci & H. Hembrooke (Eds.), Expert testimony in child abuse cases: What can and should be said in court (pp. 185-215). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kovera, M. B., & Borgida, E. (1997). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse trials: The admissibility of psychological science. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, S105-S129.
Kovera, M. B., & Borgida, E. (1996). Children on the witness stand: The use of expert testimony and other procedural innovations in U.S. child sexual abuse cases. In B. L. Bottoms & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), International perspectives on child abuse and children's testimony: Psychological research and law (pp. 201-220). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kovera, M. B., Borgida, E., Gresham, A. W., Swim, J., & Gray, E. (1995). Child sexual abuse questionnaire. [On Line]. [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: CDPfile: HaPI-CD: HaPI Item 38018.
Kovera, M. B., & Cass, S. A. (2002). Compelled mental health examinations, liability decisions, and damage awards in sexual harassment cases: Issues for jury research. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 8, 96-114.
Kovera, M. B., Dickinson, J., & Cutler, B. L. (2002). Voir dire and jury selection. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Volume 11: Forensic psychology (pp. 161-175). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kovera, M. B., Gresham, A. W., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P. C. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision-making? A social-cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178-191.
Kovera, M.B., & McAuliff, B.D. (2000). The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judges evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 574- 586.
Kovera, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (1999). Child witnesses in custody cases: The effects of system and estimator variables on the accuracy of their reports. In R. Galatzer-Levy & L. Kraus (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kovera, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (1996, November). Same-sex cases pose legal problems: Fourth Circuit decision appealed to Supreme Court. APA Monitor, 27, 24.
Kovera, M. B., McAuliff, B. D., & Hebert, K. S. (1999). Reasoning about scientific evidence: The effects of juror gender and evidence quality on juror decisions in a hostile work environment case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 362-375.
Kovera, M. B., Penrod, S. D., Pappas, C., & Thill, D. L. (1997). Identification of computer-generated facial composites. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 235-246.
Kovera, M. B., & Phillips, M. R. (1997). Instructions on death. APA Monitor, 28, 24
Kovera, M. B., Russano, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (2002). Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers’ abilities to evaluate Expert Evidence in hostile work environment cases. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 8, 180-200.
Kravitz, D. A., Cutler, B. L., & Brock, P. (1993). Reliability and validity of the original and revised legal attitudes questionnaire. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 661-677.
Levett, L. M., & Kovera, M. B. (2002, December). Psychologists battle over the general acceptance of eyewitness research. APA Monitor, 33(12), x.
McAuliff, B. D., & Kovera, M. B. (2002). The status of evidentiary and procedural innovations in child abuse proceedings. In B.L. Bottoms, M. B. Kovera, & B. D. McAuliff (Eds.), Children, social science, and the law (p. 412-445). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McAuliff, B. D., & Kovera, M. B. (1999, May). Murder case may alter hearsay rules. APA Monitor, 30(5), 44.
McAuliff, B. D., & Kovera, M. B. (1998, November). Reviewing nonscientific expert evidence. APA Monitor, 29(10), 25.
McAuliff, B. D., & Kovera, M. B. (1997, May). Child-abuse test ruled inadmissible. APA Monitor, 28, p. 25.
McCauley, M. R. & Fisher, R. P. (1995). Enhancing children's eyewitness testimony with the Cognitive Interview (pp. 127-134). In G. M. Davies, S. Lloyd Bostock, M. McMurran, & C. Wilson (Eds.) Psychology and Law: Advances in Research. Berlin: DeGruyter.
McCauley, M. R., & Fisher, R. P. (1995). Facilitating children's recall with the revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 510-516.
McCauley, M. & Parker, J.F. (2001). When will a child be believed? The impact of victim's age and juror's gender on children's credibility and verdict in a child abuse case. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 523-539.
Meissner, C. A. (2002). Applied aspects of the instructional bias effect in verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 911-928.
Meissner, C. A. & Brigham, J. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 603-616.
Meissner, C. A. & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 7, 3-35.
Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory & Cognition, 29, 176-186.
Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Pfeifer, J. E. (2003). Jury nullification: The influence of judicial instruction on the relationship between attitudes and juridic decision-making. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 25, 243-254.
Meissner, C. A. & Kassin, S. M. (in press). “You’re guilty, so just confess!” The influence of investigative bias and behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room. In D. Lassiter’s (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Press.
Meissner, C. A. & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law & Human Behavior, 26, 469-480.
Meissner, C. A. & Memon, A. (2002). Verbal overshadowing: A special issue exploring theoretical and applied issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 869-872.
Meissner, C. A. & Russano, M. B. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and false confessions: Research and recommendations. Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 1, 53-64.
Meissner, C. A., Tredoux, C. G., Parker, J. F., & MacLin, O. H. (2005). Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Memory & Cognition, 33, 783-792.
Mello, E. W., & Fisher, R. P. (1996). Enhancing older adult eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 403-417.
Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621-637.
Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1997). Bogus publicity items and the contingency between awareness and media induced pretrial prejudice. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 339-344.
Moran, G., Cutler, B. L., & Loftus, E. F. (1990). Jury selection in major controlled substance trials: The need for extended voir dire. Forensic Reports, 3, 331-348.
Narby, D. J., Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Estimator variables and eyewitness memory. In S. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, and G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological Issues in Eyewitness Identification (pp. 23-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O'Neil, K. M., & Penrod, S. D. (2001). Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 226-233.
O’Neil, K. M., Penrod, S. D., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Web-based research: Methodological variables’ effects on dropout and sample characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 217-226.
O’Neil, K. M., Patry, M. W., & Penrod, S. D. (2004). Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 10, 443-470.
Parker, J. F. (in press). Identification behavior of child eyewitnesses. Invited chapter for publication in M. P. Toglia, D. P. Peters & S. J. Ceci (Eds.), International Research and Legal Perspectives on the Child Witness.
Parker, J.F. (1997). Child witnesses' recognition. Expert Evidence, 5, 118-119.
Parker, J. F. (1995). Age differences in source monitoring of performed and imagined actions on immediate and delayed tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 84-101.
Parker, J. F., Bahrick, L., Fivush, R., & Johnson, P. (2006). The impact of stress on mothers' memory of a natural disaster. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Parker, J. F., Bahrick, L., Lundy, B., Fivush, R., & Levitt, M. (1998). Memory and stress in preschoolers. In D. Hermann, C. Thompson, D. Read, D. Bruce, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Parker, J. F., & Myers, A. (2001). Attempts to improve children’s identifications from sequential-presentation lineups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 796-815.
Penrod, S. D., & Cutler, B. L. (in press). The case against traditional safeguards: Preventing mistaken convictions in eyewitness identification trials. In R. Rosech & S. D. Hart (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline. New York: Plenum Press.
Penrod, S. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relationship. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 817-845.
Penrod, S. D., Fulero, S. M., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Expert testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: The state of the law and science. Behavioral Science & the Law, 13, 229-259.
Penrod, S. D., Fulero, S. M., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Expert psychological testimony in the United States: A new playing field? International Test Commission, 11, 65-72.
Phillips, M., McAuliff, B.D., Kovera, M.B., & Cutler, B.L. (1999). Double-blind lineup administrations as a safeguard against investigator bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 940-951.
Phillips, M. R., & Kovera, M. B. (2000, November). Implications of the Boy Scouts of America case. APA Monitor, 31(10), 77.
Phillips, M. R., & Kovera, M. B. (1997, November). Instructions on death. APA Monitor, 28(10), 43.
Rose, S. M. (in press). Community interventions concerning homophobic violence and partner violence against lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies.
Rose, S. M. & Mechanic, M. (2002). Psychological distress, crime features, and help-seeking behaviors related to homophobic bias incidents, American Behavioral Scientist, 14-26.
Russano, M., & Kovera, M. B. (2000, March). Supreme Court revisits Miranda warnings. APA Monitor, 31(3), 77.
Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16, 481-486.
Schreiber, N. (2000). Interviewing techniques in sexual abuse cases--A comparison of a day-care abuse case with normal abuse cases. Swiss Journal of Psychology - Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie - Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 59, 196-206.
Schreiber, N. (in press). Another piece to the child witness puzzle. [Review of the book Memory and Suggestibility in the Forensic Interview]. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Schreiber, N., Bellah, L. D., Martinez, Y., McLaurin, K. A., Strok, R., Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (in press). Suggestive interviewing in the McMartin Preschool and Kelly Michaels Daycare abuse cases: A case study. Social Influence.
Schreiber, N., & Parker, J. F. (2004). Inviting witnesses to speculate: Effects of age and interaction on children's recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 31-52.
Schreiber, N., Wentura, D., & Bilsky, W. (2001). "What else could he have done?" Creating false answers in child witnesses by inviting speculation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 525-532
Schwartz, B. L., Fisher, R. P., & Hebert, K. S. (1998). The relation of output order and commission errors in free recall and eyewitness accounts. Memory, 6, 257-275.
Schwartz, B. L., Meissner, C. A., Hoffman, M., Evans, S., & Frazier, L. D. (2004). Event memory and misinformation effects in a gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Animal Cognition, 7, 93-100.
Slone, A. E., Brigham, J. C., & Meissner, C. A. (2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in Whites. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 71-84.
Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S. D., Read, J. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Choosing, confidence and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
Stinson, V., Devenport, J. L., Cutler, B. L., & Kravitz, D. K. (1996). How effective is the presence-of-counsel safeguard? Attorney perceptions of suggestiveness, fairness, and correctability of biased lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 64-75.
Stinson, V., Devenport, J. L., Cutler, B. L., & Kravitz, D. K. (1997). How effective is the motion-to-suppress safeguard? Judges’ perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 211-220.
Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (in press). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. P. (in press). An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview. Law and Human Behavior.
Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R.C.L., Turtle, J. W., Malpass, R.S., Fisher, R.P., & Fulero, S.M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581-598
West, C., & Rose, S. (2000). Dating aggression among African Americans: An examination of gender differences and adversarial beliefs. Violence Against Women, 6, 470-494.
|
